|
2010/2011
Module Code:
SE3S04
Module Title:
Advanced Internet Development先进的互联网发展
Lecturer:
Dr Phil Davies菲尔·戴维斯博士
Assignment No:
3 No. of pages in total including this page:
N/A Maximum Word Count:
3000
Assignment Title:作业分配标题
Design of a Web 2.0 system (similar to Facebook) that includes considerations concerning Accessibility for a specific user group.一个Web 2.0系统（类似于Facebook），其中包括为特定的用户组考虑无障碍设计。
Task任务
You are to produce a design document (in the form of an essay) that will detail the needs of a Facebook type system for a group of students who suffer from various degrees of visual impairment. Your essay is to include where appropriate examples showing screen design and code such as CSS that would be appropriate.您是设计文档（在一篇作文的形式），将详细介绍一个网站类型系统遭受不同程度的视力障碍的学生为一组的需求。你的文章是包括适当的例子显示屏幕的设计和代码，如CSS，将是适当的。
The user group is to be a class of 20 students between the ages of 16-21, and the idea of the system is to provide both a learning and social environment. There will be ‘administrators’ present in the form of teachers who are allowed to moderate, provide teaching type material and also consider group set up. The students themselves may wish to form themselves into social groups.assignment写作要求用户群是16-21岁之间的20名学生一类，和系统的想法是提供一个学习和社会环境。将有“管理员”的形式存在于教师允许适度，提供教学型材料，并考虑集团成立。自己的学生，不妨拼成社会团体的
Your essay must not become a general design but must include suggestions as to appropriate s/w and h/w platforms to be used to support the development of the system. The more examples you provide detailing these appropriate platforms the better will be your possible grade.你的文章必须成为一种普遍的设计，但必须包括建议适当的S / W和H / W平台将用于支持开发的系统。您提供更多的例子，详细说明这些适当的平台，更好的将是你可能成绩。
The students will be expected to gain access to the system via a standard browser, however the platform they use may well vary from desktop, notebook, mobile, etc. A key consideration must be the needs of the user group and how your Facebook type system supports their needs.学生将有望获得对系统的访问通过一个标准的浏览器，但是他们使用的平台可能会从台式机，笔记本，手机等不同的一个关键的考虑因素必须是用户群的需求和您的Facebook类系统如何支持他们的需求。
Section A: Record of Submission
Record of Submission and Plagiarism Declaration
I declare that this assignment is my own work and that the sources of information and material I have used (including the internet) have been fully identified and properly acknowledged as required in the referencing guidelines provided.
Student Number:
You are required to acknowledge that you have read the above statement by writing your student number(s) above.
Details of Submission
Note that all work handed in after the submission date and within 5 working days will be capped at 40%. No marks will be awarded if the assignment is submitted after the late submission date unless mitigating circumstances are applied for and accepted.
• IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO KEEP A RECORD OF ALL WORK SUBMITTED.
• Work should also be submitted to the member of academic staff responsible for setting your work on a CD
• Work not submitted to the lecturer responsible may, exceptionally, be submitted (on the submission date) to the reception of the Faculty of Advanced Technology, which is on the 2nd floor of G block (Room G221) where a receipt will be issued.
Mitigating Circumstances: if there are any exceptional circumstances which may have affected your ability to undertake or submit this assignment, make sure you contact the Faculty Advice Shop on 01443 482540 (G221).
Section B : Marking and Assessment
This assignment will be marked out of 100
This assignment contributes to 15% of the total module marks.
This assignment is bonded .. a composite mark of 40% for all assessment elements is required for a pass in this module
It is estimated that you should spend approximately
15 hours on this Assignment.
Date Set:
15th Feb, 2011 Submission Date:
3rd May, Tuesday Return Date:
20 working days after submission
Learning Outcomes
This assignment addresses the following learning outcome(s) of the module:
Learning Outcome 2
Marking Scheme Marks Available Marks Awarded
Marks will be awarded for clarity of design, consideration of accessibility needs, suggestions concerning appropriate s/w & h/w and proposed functionality of the Web 2.0 system. 100
Assessment Criteria
Performance Level Criteria
Fail
(< 40%) Failed to meet learning outcomes of assignment
3rd Class / PASS
(40% - 49%) Has considered to some extent the needs of the users, some design shown and limited h/w and s/w suggestions
Lower 2nd Class / PASS
(50% - 59%) Has considered the needs of the users, reasonable design decisions but some weaknesses present, overview of h/w and s/w needs
Upper 2nd Class / MERIT
(60% - 69%) Good consideration of the user group needs, some good design of the functionality and good suggestions concerning h/w and s/w needs
1st Class / DISTINCTION
(70% +) Good consideration of the user group needs and appropriate consideration of the expected functionality with few if any failings. Good critical consideration given as to the selection of appropriate h/w and s/w.
|
 |
|||
| 网站地图 |
