|
论文题目：Interactive Web Applications Check List 1 Provide a CD containing the code, which must be supplied in an appropriate plastic case and stuck to the back cover of the report. It should be marked with students name and P number.
TASK DESCRIPTION
Marks available
2nd marker Demonstrate how these techniques can be used to produce visually very appealing web pages. Rollovers You must also demonstrate techniques for obtaining dynamic content and updating the contents of pages using AJAX to interface to a database connection using ASP.Net. The techniques demonstrated must include:- Reading a table Marks will be awarded for integrating these techniques into a good page design.
30
30
10
10 As this course is assessed by assignment only, a high quality deliverable is expected. This assignment counts for 50% of the total marks for the course.
Generic Grading Criteria (Degree) 35-39 A mark in this range is indicative that the work is below, but at the upper end is approaching the standard required at the current level of your Degree programme. Whilst some points are correctly presented there are serious errors and/or omissions and/or irrelevant material. It indicates work of an insufficient standard. It will show very limited knowledge or understanding of the relevant subject area, and display weak writing and analytical skills and/or poor application of technique. Writing will exhibit weak grammar, very inadequate or absent references and/or bibliography and may contain major factual errors. Quantitative work will contain significant errors and incorrect conclusions. 40-49 A mark in this range is indicative that the work is of an acceptable standard at the current the level of your Degree programme. Work demonstrates some familiarity with and grasp of a factual/conceptual knowledge base for the field of study and/or ability to employ specialist skills, but only just meeting threshold standards. Work may be characterised by some significant errors, omissions or problems, but there will be sufficient evidence of development and competence. Writing may be poorly presented without properly laid out referencing/bibliography, or in the case of quantitative work, it may not be possible to follow the logic and reasoning leading to the results obtained and the conclusions reached. 50-59 The work is of a satisfactory to very satisfactory standard at the current level of your Degree programme. Work demonstrates ability to evaluate new information, concepts and evidence from a range of sources and generate ideas through the analysis of concepts at an abstract level. Arguments and issues will be discussed and referenced, but these may not be fully documented or detailed. The work will be mostly accurate and provide some evidence of the ability to analyse, synthesise, evaluate and apply required methods/techniques. There will be no serious omissions or inaccuracies. There will be good evidence of ability to take responsibility for own learning including the selection and use of relevant techniques and applying creative skills. With Quantitative work it should be possible to follow the logical steps leading to the answer obtained and the conclusions reached. 60-69 A mark in this range is indicative of that the work is of a very good standard for the current level of your Degree programme. Work of commendable quality commanding wide ranging specialised technical, creative and/or conceptual skills. There will be consistent evidence of capability in all relevant subject-based skills, including the ability to self-evaluate and work autonomously and to use effectively specified techniques in appropriate contexts. 70-84 A mark in this range is indicative that the work is of an excellent standard for the current level of your Degree programme. Work is based on a rigorous and broad knowledge base, demonstrating ability to analyse, synthesise, evaluate concepts and/or interpret and describe the creative expression and the associated workflow process including both the design and development/production considerations. 85-100 A mark in this range is indicative of outstanding work. Marks in this range will be awarded for work that exhibits excellent levels of knowledge and understanding throughout with substantial elements of originality and flair. The work will demonstrate a broad range of critical reading that goes well beyond that provided on reading lists. Marks at the upper end of the range will indicate that the work is of publishable, or near publishable academic standard.#p#分页标题#e#
|
 |
|||
| 网站地图 |
